To this day the Atlético de Madrid is a direct rival of Real Madrid. Something unthinkable before the arrival of Diego Pablo Simeone. But that’s how it is. I understand that the institutional relations between both clubs have to be good but in the end allow whites to play in the Metropolitan It would strengthen them economically … and the enemy or water.
The other day in Salvados the president of Unionists, rival of Real Madrid in his day in the Copa del Rey, confessed that the benefit of playing in a Santiago Bernabeu packed with tickets at 20 euros it was a million euros. You can imagine the economic contribution that whites could receive with a stadium like the Wanda to 20 or 30% capacity with more expensive tickets … Now multiply it by five or six games that are going to play … and Florentine I would already have to pay a middle-class player on the squad.
Nor do I forget what happened in the 1990s when the Atlético de Madrid yielded the Vicente Calderón to the Real Madrid to play against him Vallecano Ray, and the most radical white group tore the seats and vandalized the toilets.
I also remember which team was the first to celebrate their titles in the Cybele in the 80s. Few already remember it but it was the fans of the Atlético de Madrid. The whites liked the tradition and imitated them to such an extent that they had no problem bathing in the same fountain as the mattress makers … for that reason they moved to Neptune…
Also don’t they say now that soccer is global? Well, reward the fans of Valladolid, Seville, Valencia…. and go there to play the games. They may even raise the option of crossing the border and expanding through United States, China or Ecuador. So they can serve all their fans.
No water to the enemy. Ten years ago more than a Madridista told you that “if my second team is the Athletics”, And now for the vast majority one of the best days of their lives was the Tenth Champions League… Life things. Although it seems even more curious to me those white fans worried about Atleti playing better: “I would like them to Simeone He left so that someone could come to make Atleti better ”. The same ones who applauded Mourinho. Country.
Finally, say that the lordship is demonstrated in another way by respecting your rival.
I understand the reluctance to let the eternal rival occupy your house, but fortunately, today, the Atlético de Madrid it is above these things. Gone is the time when whites looked over their shoulders at their neighbors. Now, as equals at least, despite the harmful environment’s attempts to lift some up and sink others.
That Madrid needs the Metropolitan (Wanda for them) to play some games, then go ahead. The lordship is demonstrated by walking. And this transfer should not be understood as bowing to the powerful. Quite the contrary. For this reason, it would be good for Atlético to leave its stadium to Madrid.
Of course, a series of conditions would have to be met for it to be possible. That not only the entity that presides Florentino Pérez would benefit. If there are profits, they are distributed. That nothing in the stadium is destroyed. That the Atlético shield, the one that is not stepped on, continues to preside over the grass. And as a friend says, a hydration break is mandatory in each part even if it is zero degrees.
In recent years, the ‘madriditis’ that they proclaimed so much has given way to a’ colchoneritis‘with very sharp peaks in recent months, and it is not a question of stopping that dynamic because the colchoneros do not leave the stadium to Madrid.
Athletics who are not in favor, look back, remember the Panda without ITV, the ‘dogso zone’, the League ‘given away’ to those of Simeone by the referees, Llorente’s goal two seconds out of time, the cuckoo or the famous hydration break. Smile And if Madrid has to play in the Metropolitan, let him play. The champion always reaches out to the needy.